Six million lines. Twelve weeks. The New York Times evolved PLATO off Oracle with Aedeon.

Introducing Aedeon

Your business never stops evolving. Now your systems can keep up.

The system of record for how your software actually works, and the engine that evolves it.

Aedeon maps every application, database and business rule you run into one living graph — then evolves them from a sentence of intent, verified against your production traffic before it ships.

Never trained on your code Runs in your cloud Your team approves every step
Graph live Aedeon Graph  ·  billing-platform
0nodes
0edges
16relationship kinds
Applications Schemas Stored procs Business rules
Customer proof The New York Times ·  PLATO  ·  Oracle 12c → Aurora PostgreSQL live June 1, 2026
0.0M
lines of code
evolved
0
weeks, end to end
0.0×
faster than
conventional
0%
verified before
cutover
Lines evolved · 12 weeks map · evolve · prove · ship
Evolved PLATO off Oracle onto Aurora with Aedeon — verified against production traffic before it shipped. Read the full story →

The cadence gap

Your business changes every quarter.
Your systems change once a decade.

Every quarter brings a reason your systems have to change: a new product, a new regulation, a new platform, a database license you want to leave behind. The systems themselves were written over twenty years, across millions of lines and hundreds of applications. No technology has ever given you a full view of how they actually work, or a safe way to change them from intent.

Cadence·outer: business   inner: systems
In step Drifting Out of step

The gap widens every quarter you cannot change

Your team inherited systems it has to keep running but was never told why they work the way they do. That knowledge left with the original developers.

A pricing tier sits in a stored procedure. A compliance check runs as a database policy. Your team searches the application code and finds nothing.

It was written once, at the end of a project, by someone with a deadline. Every team has a wiki it stopped trusting years ago.

The nightly job, the finance report, the partner integration. Each reads the same table from a different codebase, and none of them are in the plan.

So every change starts with months of manual archaeology, and guesses get baked into whatever ships. You approved a roadmap. The roadmap described a system. The system had changed. Eight months in, the discovery work nobody scoped arrives as a change order, the date moves, and you are the one explaining why.

0% of 24,000 transformation
initiatives fall short
0% over budget, on projects
above $15 million
0% less value delivered
than forecast
0% go badly enough to
threaten the company

Bain’s study of more than 24,000 transformation initiatives found that 88% fall short of their original ambitions. McKinsey’s review of 5,400 IT projects with the University of Oxford found that projects above $15 million run 45% over budget and deliver 56% less value than forecast, and that 17% go badly enough to threaten the company itself.

Bain · McKinsey with the University of Oxford

The three alternatives

01

Rebuild it new, with greenfield AI tools

Vibe-coding platforms and IDE assistants generate net-new applications from prompts. They have no semantic model of the applications, databases or data platforms you already run, so they cannot read or preserve the systems running the business.

stalls at · No semantic model
02

Auto-refactor it, with autonomous agents

Async agents that reason inside a single repository. No model of the infrastructure, the data platform or the rules that cross systems, and no evidence the new behavior matches the old.

stalls at · One repo at a time
03

Outsource it, to an integrator with AI on top

A thirty-year-old delivery model with accelerators bolted on, sold by the consultant-quarter. The economics do not change and neither does the failure rate, because the incentive is change orders rather than throughput.

stalls at · Billed by the quarter

The solution

The same change, run twice.

Point an AI coding agent at the billing repo and tell it to move off Oracle. It will tell you it is done. Then run the same change against the graph.

0 / 100
Without the graph shipped · outage A naive AI agent
✓billing_schema.sqlL1-L340
✓billing_queries.tsL44-L212
✓orm.config.tsL18-L60
✓models/invoice.tsL1-L180
✓services/billing.tsL88-L410

Not seen

Rate-tier business ruleBusiness rule
Nightly reconciliation jobPipeline
Two compliance checksDB policy
Downstream BI feedLineage
11 integration testsTests

Each one is an outage, an audit finding, or a quarter of cleanup — discovered in production.

With Aedeon verified · shipped Graph · Supervisor · Evolve
billing sp_calc_rate_tier db_policies warehouse.bi oracle_tests nightly_recon

Evolve plan

✓Handle: Rate-tier business rulesp_calc_rate_tier.sql
✓Handle: Nightly reconciliation jobops/nightly_recon.py
✓Handle: Two compliance checksdb/policies/*.sql
✓Handle: Downstream BI feedwarehouse/dbt/models/billing.sql
✓Handle: 11 integration teststests/it/oracle_*.spec.ts
Evolve: verifying on real production traffic Nothing missed. Verified — before it shipped.

With Aedeon the same change runs against the graph. Graph had already mapped the stored-procedure rule, the reconciliation job, the database-layer checks and the cross-system lineage — because it reads all the code, not one repo. Supervisor planned all of it from one sentence of intent. Evolve performed the change and verified the new system against the old on production traffic.

Twenty-year-old systems. AI-speed expectations. Something had to give.

Introducing Aedeon

The system of record for how your software actually works, and the engine that evolves it.

Aedeon reads all of your code, not one repository at a time, and builds a living map of how your applications, databases, pipelines and business rules connect. You tell it the outcome you want in a sentence. It writes the plan, your architects edit and approve it, and its agents perform the change and check the new system against the old one on your real traffic before anything ships.

The map stays afterward. Your next change starts from it.

One graph·four layers, linked
Applications Databases Pipelines Rules

Red links cross systems — what one-repo tools miss

Instead of
You get
Months of discovery before anyone can plan
A map built from your own code in about an hour per system
A roadmap written from assumptions
A plan written from what your systems actually do, that your architects edit
Finding out at cutover whether it worked
The new system checked against the old one on production traffic before it ships

How “verified” works

Shadow trafficReplay → compare → gateNothing ships unverified
01  REPLAY 02  COMPARE 03  GATE Production real traffic Old system Oracle New system Aurora PostgreSQL Compare every response Divergence found fix · replay · re-check 0 divergences the gate opens Ship your Git 2,412,880 requests replayed on the NYT evolution · 0 divergences at cutover
Drag the figure →Replay · compare · gate · ship2,412,880 requests replayed · 0 divergences

Nothing reaches production until the new behaves like the old

How this differs

Three ways to change a system that is already running the business.

A modernization program A migration project Aedeon Evolve
What it is

A program to rebuild aging systems

A project to move a system somewhere else

Something your systems do continuously

Where it starts

A business case and a discovery phase

A target platform and a cutover date

One sentence describing the outcome you want

Who does the work

An integrator, billed by the quarter

A migration team, billed by the project

Your team, with Aedeon’s agents under their approval

How you know it worked

User acceptance testing, after the fact

A cutover weekend

Verified against your production traffic before it ships

What you have afterwards

A new system, and a team that has left

The same system in a different place

A changed system, and a map that keeps updating

What the next change costs

A new business case

A new project

Less than the last one

The product

Map → Evolve.

Three products. One workspace. Two beats.

Two beatsMap → EvolveClick a stage
Map Evolve Your source Graph living map version-stamped Supervisor intent → plan you approve Evolve agents perform gate by gate Verified on production traffic Your Git plans against the graph the map stays — your next change starts from it One workspace: Studio
Drag the figure →Parses every application, database, pipeline and business rule from your source, and links them across systems.
Aedeon Graph

The living semantic map of how your systems actually work. Every application, database, pipeline and business rule, parsed from your code, connected across systems, and kept current as they change.

94–98% of business logic mapped automatically

Aedeon Supervisor

Our proprietary 2.2B-parameter planning model, trained on two decades of enterprise systems-engineering best practices and never on customer code. Tell it what you want, in a sentence, and it converts that intent into a step-by-step plan and orchestrates the frontier models against your graph.

Supervisor·“Get us off Oracle.” → plan

One sentence in. Eleven steps out.

Aedeon Evolve

The agents that perform the change: updates, upgrades, replatforms, refactors, rewrites. Your team approves every gate. Every change is verified against the old system on your real traffic and lands in your Git with its full history attached.

Evolve·amber: Oracle   green: Aurora

Humans are always in the loop

Aedeon Studio is the workspace where all of it happens: one interface for exploring the graph, expressing intent, reviewing plans and approving changes.

Say it in a sentence

Tell Aedeon the outcome. It handles the rest.

Aedeon does

See it working

This is what it looks like.

Graph  ·  get-us-off-oracle Impact traced

Drag a node · click to inspect

The second change costs less than the first

Every change makes the next one cheaper.

Today, every big change starts the same way: months spent working out how your systems actually work. When the project ends, the team moves on, and that knowledge leaves with them. So the next project starts from scratch, and costs just as much.

Aedeon keeps a living record of your systems and of every change made to them. Your first change pays to build that map. Every change after it starts from what Aedeon already knows, so there is less to work out each time, and the cost keeps coming down.

Your modernization program will end, and your people will move on to other projects. The Aedeon Graph keeps evolving as your systems change, ready for the next one.

Security

Your code stays yours.

The six questions a CISO asks, answered on the page. Your graph, your source and your analysis stay inside your own tenant — no pooled indexes, no cross-tenant embeddings, and no training on your code.

Multi-tenant·every customer sealed in its own tenant

Private VPC · sovereign region · air-gapped

Never trained on your code

No pooled indexes. No cross-tenant embeddings. Your graph, your source and your analysis stay inside your own tenant. Supervisor is trained on engineering best practices and never on customer code.

Runs inside your boundary

Private VPC deployment in your cloud, a sovereign region, or fully air-gapped. Bring your own keys.

Defended in depth

WAF, IDS and IPS, real-time threat monitoring, and encryption across transport, storage and archival.

Your team approves every step

Nothing executes until a person approves it. Architects can edit any plan before it runs.

Compliance moves with the change

SOX, PCI and HIPAA impact diffs on every change, so the audit trail gets stronger as your systems evolve.

You own the record

Source, analysis, model, approvals and verification runs, all attached to the commit in your Git.

SOC 2, PCI DSS and HIPAA certifications in progress. Models orchestrated: Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini and xAI Grok, limited to the ones your organization approves.

Visit the Trust Center →

Why we built Aedeon

“Software has always been easier to write than to change. Every enterprise runs on systems it can no longer safely touch — because nothing ever recorded how they actually work. Finance has a ledger. Sales has a CRM. Software needs a knowledge graph.

When frontier models made the missing system buildable, we built it: a living map of your systems, and an engine that turns your intent into verified change.”

Pricing

Subscription + pay as you go. Start without an upfront commitment.

You pay for the platform and for the evolution credits actually used. One credit is 1,000 AI tokens, and every plan shows its estimated cost before you approve it. There are no consultant quarters and no change orders.

Route 01

I have one system in mind

Connect one repository and watch the graph build. About an hour.

Start free trial →

Route 02

I do not know what I have

Get the map before you commit to any change. The honest first step for most enterprises.

Book a demo →

Route 03

I want to see it first

Ninety seconds, no form. Map, plan, verified change, landed in your Git.

Watch the demo →

Answers

Answers.

Start here

See your systems mapped.

Connect one real system and watch the graph build. Then describe one change and see what comes back.

hello@aedeon.ai